We'd appreciate your feedback. Send feedback Subscribe to our newsletters and alerts


Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research

2024 Volume 4 Issue 2

Comparison of Bacterial Cellulose and Acellular Dermal Matrices Seeded with Fibroblasts versus Free Gingival Grafts: A Randomized Animal Study


, ,
  1. Department of Orthodontics and Biomaterials Engineering, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  2. Department of Periodontology and Dental Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract

Mucogingival defects (MGDs), such as dental root recessions, decreased vestibular depth, and absence of keratinized tissues, are commonly seen in dental clinics. MGDs may result in functional, aesthetic, and hygienic concerns. In these situations, autogenous soft tissue grafts are considered the gold-standard treatment. This study compares the healing process of free gingival grafts (FGGs) to bacterial cellulose matrix (BCM) and human acellular dermal matrix (ADM) seeded with fibroblasts from culture supplemented with platelet-rich plasma in a rat model. Surgical defects were made in rats, which received the following treatments in a randomized manner: group I, negative control (defect creation only); group II, positive control (FGG); group III, BCM; group IV, BCM + fibroblasts; group V, ADM; and group VI, ADM + fibroblasts. Clinical, histological, and immunological analyses were performed 15 days after grafting. Clinical examinations recorded epithelium regularity and the presence of ulcers, erythema, and/or edema. The histological analysis revealed the degree of reepithelization, width, regularity, and presence of keratin. The Fisher exact statistical test was applied to the results (P<0.05). No groups showed ulcers except for group I. All groups had regular epithelium without erythema and without edema. Histologically, all groups exhibited regular epithelium with keratinization, and myofibroblasts were present in the connective tissue. The groups that received engineered grafts showed similar clinical and histological results to the FGG group. Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that BCM and ADM can be used as cell scaffolds, with ADM yielding the best results. This study supports the use of this technical protocol in humans.


How to cite this article
Vancouver
Romano G, Bianchi M, Conti P. Comparison of Bacterial Cellulose and Acellular Dermal Matrices Seeded with Fibroblasts versus Free Gingival Grafts: A Randomized Animal Study. . 2024;4(2):124-34.
APA
Romano, G., Bianchi, M., & Conti, P. (2024). Comparison of Bacterial Cellulose and Acellular Dermal Matrices Seeded with Fibroblasts versus Free Gingival Grafts: A Randomized Animal Study. Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research, 4(2), 124-134.
Articles
Effect of Stabilization Discs on Orthodontic Mini-Implant Success: An Experimental Study
Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research
Vol 5 Issue 1, 2025 | Miguel J. Castillo
Nickel Ion Release from Nickel-Containing Orthodontic Archwires: A Narrative Review of Experimental and Clinical Evidence
Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research
Vol 2 Issue 2, 2022 | Balazs H. Varga
Interprofessional Collaboration between Orthodontists and Oral Hygienists: Findings from a Survey Study
Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research
Vol 4 Issue 1, 2024 | Kenji S. Sato
Effect of Fiber Reinforcement on Microleakage and Fatigue Resistance of Composite Restorations
Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research
Vol 2 Issue 1, 2022 | Erik J. Svensson
Awareness and Perceptions of Periodontal–Systemic Relationships Among Dental Practitioners
Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research
Vol 2 Issue 1, 2022 | Yousef X. Khalil
Clinical Competence in Orthodontic Diagnosis among Final-Year Dental Students: An Evaluative Study
Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research
Vol 5 Issue 2, 2025 | Noura Haddad
Preventive Strategies for White Spot Lesions Associated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Review
Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research
Vol 5 Issue 2, 2025 | Lucie F. Kaczmarek
Nickel Ion Release from Orthodontic Archwires: A Narrative Review of Experimental and Clinical Studies
Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research
Vol 5 Issue 2, 2025 | Naledi D. Diallo
Comparative Evaluation of Mandibular Kinematics in Orthodontic Patients Using Optical Jaw Tracking Technology
Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research
Vol 5 Issue 2, 2025 | Camila P. Ramirez
Cytotoxic and Endocrine Disrupting Effects of Removable Orthodontic Retainer Materials: A Comprehensive Review
Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research
Vol 5 Issue 2, 2025 | Usman Singh
Educational Impact of 3D-Printed Cleft Lip and Palate Phantom Models in Undergraduate Orthodontic Training
Journal of Orthodontic and Periodontal Biomaterials Research
Vol 5 Issue 2, 2025 | Pavel C. Kaczmarek
Scan to access this article
View Full HTML Download PDF
Downloads: 30

Views: 67
Share Article:

About GalaxyPub

Find out more

Our esteemed publisher is committed to advancing medical knowledge through rigorous research dissemination. We exclusively accept submissions related to the field of medicine.

Our journals provide a platform for clinicians, researchers, and scholars to share groundbreaking discoveries, clinical insights, and evidence-based practices. By maintaining this specialized focus, we ensure that their publications contribute significantly to the advancement of healthcare worldwide.