We'd appreciate your feedback. Send feedback Subscribe to our newsletters and alerts


Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer

2026 Volume 6 Issue 1

Comparative Effectiveness of Cytoreductive Surgery and Systemic Therapy in Stage IV Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms


, , ,
  1. Department of Clinical Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  2. Department of Oncology and Cancer Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
  3. Department of Translational Cancer Research, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Abstract

The definitive contribution of surgical cytoreduction in stage IV gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) remains unclear, as corroborating data come largely from retrospective reviews that infrequently compare surgery with current systemic regimens. Drawing on a nationwide oncology registry, we compared overall survival (OS) with cytoreductive surgery versus systemic therapy alone. Eligible adults had a diagnosis of stage IV, well-differentiated GEP-NEN documented in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2020. Patients were grouped by demographic, tumor, and institutional attributes. The three therapeutic strategies evaluated were cytoreductive surgery (CRS) as the sole modality, CRS in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy without surgery. Overall survival (OS) was examined via Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimation and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. The analytic set included 3,183 individuals with stage IV GEP-NENs. Nearly 70% (69.8%) were managed with CRS alone, a small fraction (6.7%) received both CRS and systemic chemotherapy, and the remaining 23.4% underwent systemic therapy exclusively. Median overall survival (OS) diverged substantially across these strategies: patients receiving CRS alone reached a median of 140.9 months, those receiving both modalities had a median of 96.2 months, and those receiving systemic therapy alone had a median of 51.6 months (P < 0.001). The advantage conferred by CRS within each histologic grade category, evident in G1–G2 tumors (140.9 vs. 96.2 vs. 53.6 months; P < 0.001), was also observed in G3 well-differentiated tumors (39.8 vs. 13.1 vs. 9.6 months; P < 0.001). These benefits extended across the range of primary organ sites. For midgut primaries, median OS measured 157.6, 99.2, and 87.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001); for pancreatic primaries, the figures were 117.5 months, not reached, and 50.8 months (P < 0.001). In a multivariable framework, advancing age, lower socioeconomic standing, higher comorbidity indices, colorectal primary location, positive resection margins, and increasing tumor grade independently predicted worse survival. A surgery delay beyond 35 days from diagnosis was associated with more favorable survival outcomes. CRS emerged as an independent predictor of longer OS (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67-0.94). Receipt of systemic chemotherapy, by contrast, was independently tracked with elevated mortality risk (HR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.36-2.17). Surgical cytoreduction in metastatic GEP-NENs corresponded to a clinically meaningful survival gain over management with systemic therapy alone. This observation was reproduced within every histologic grade and primary site examined. These results lend weight to the practice of offering CRS to carefully chosen patients and highlight the pressing requirement for prospective study designs to confirm these findings.


How to cite this article
Vancouver
Ramirez C, Torres E, Ortega P, Mendes S. Comparative Effectiveness of Cytoreductive Surgery and Systemic Therapy in Stage IV Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Asian J Curr Res Clin Cancer. 2026;6(1):48-58. https://doi.org/10.51847/xnFoBaNFah
APA
Ramirez, C., Torres, E., Ortega, P., & Mendes, S. (2026). Comparative Effectiveness of Cytoreductive Surgery and Systemic Therapy in Stage IV Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer, 6(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.51847/xnFoBaNFah
Articles
Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Survivors: An In-Depth Exploration
Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer
Vol 5 Issue 1, 2025 | Zhaobei Cai
Theoretical Model of Thiophene and Its Derivatives Interaction with BRCA-1
Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer
Vol 4 Issue 2, 2024 | Lauro FigueroaValverde
A Three-Decade Overview of Female-Specific Cancers in Malaysia: A Thorough Examination
Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer
Vol 4 Issue 2, 2024 | Tahir Mehmood Khan
An Overview of Targeted Therapy Applications in Cancer Treatment
Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer
Vol 5 Issue 1, 2025 | Yeuan Ting Lee
Exploring Advanced Diagnostic Techniques for Salivary Gland Disorders: A Narrative Overview
Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer
Vol 4 Issue 1, 2024 | Chuan Xiang Li
Computational Evaluation of Dibenzo Compounds as Potential Dual Inhibitors of Androgen Receptor and 5α-Reductase
Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer
Vol 2 Issue 1, 2022 | Lauro FigueroaValverde
Comparative Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation–Associated Breast Cancer in a Japanese Cohort
Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer
Vol 5 Issue 2, 2025 | Ravi Kumar
Somatic Alterations in TP53 and KRAS and Their Functional Impact in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Asian Journal of Current Research in Clinical Cancer
Vol 5 Issue 2, 2025 | Lucas Meyer

About GalaxyPub

Find out more

Galaxy Publication is an independent scholarly publishing platform operating under the scientific and organizational designation of Eshragh Scientific and Research Center and the legal framework of ISRAK PUBLISHER EGITIM HIZMETLERI LIMITED.

The publisher is committed to ethical, transparent, and high-quality academic publishing and supports scholarly communication through internationally aligned editorial practices, publication ethics, and responsible dissemination of scientific research.